Most teams don’t fail because of skill.

They fail because of confusion.

Confusion about:

  • who owns what

  • who decides

  • who’s accountable

  • and who quietly picks up the slack

And when that confusion builds, it shows up as tension. 

Meetings get slower.

Slack threads get longer.

People get territorial.

Founders and leaders start second-guessing each other.

And for teams that are newly forming, scaling, or adding senior leaders, this tension can boil over. What looks like a “people problem” is usually a role clarity problem.

In my work mediating disputes between co-founders and executive teams, one tool consistently fixes this faster than almost anything else: a team charter.

Not a corporate document.

Not HR paperwork.

A simple, honest agreement about how everyone works together.

What Is a Team Charter (in Plain English)?

A team charter is a shared agreement that defines a team’s purpose, ownership, decision-making authority, conflict approach, and feedback norms.

It’s an operating framework. That’s it.

And for executive and startup teams, it functions like:

  • an operating system

  • a clarity tool

  • a conflict-prevention mechanism

It replaces: “I thought you had that.”

With: “You own this. I support you.”

That one shift alone changes everything, with everyone being clear on who does what. 

Why Startups and Executive Teams Struggle With Role Clarity

Early on, ambiguity feels efficient.

Everyone jumps in.

Everyone helps.

Everyone wears five hats.

But as you grow, that same flexibility becomes a source of friction.

I see this constantly with founders and leadership teams:

  • Multiple people owning the same decision

  • No one owns critical work

  • Founders overriding each other

  • Leaders stepping on toes unintentionally

  • Quiet resentment and frustration begin to build beneath the surface

At 5 people, it’s fine.

At 20 people, it’s messy.

At 50+, it’s expensive.

You don’t need more process. You need clear ownership. That’s where a team charter comes in.

Step-by-Step: How to Use a Team Charter to Realign Roles & Responsibilities

This is the exact process you can use to build out your Team Charter. 

Simple. Practical. No fluff.

I’ve used this exact process while mediating co-founder disputes and facilitating leadership realignment for executive and startup teams at critical inflection points.

Step 1 – Align on Purpose First

Before talking about roles, answer: “Why does this team exist?”

Specifically:

  • What outcomes are we accountable for?

  • What decisions live with us (not elsewhere)?

  • What does success look like this year?

If the purpose isn’t clear, the roles never will be.

Write this in 2–3 plain sentences.

This becomes your anchor.

Step 2 – List the Work (Not the Titles)

Forget job descriptions.

Instead, ask: “What work actually happens here?”

Brain-dump everything:

  • Hiring decisions

  • Budget ownership

  • Strategy

  • Client escalations

  • Product tradeoffs

  • Partnerships

  • Culture decisions

  • Performance management

This usually reveals:

  • hidden labor

  • overlaps

  • gaps

  • “Wait… no one owns that?”

That visibility is where alignment starts.

Step 3 – Assign Single-Point Ownership

Here’s the rule I insist on with every team I facilitate: One owner per responsibility.

Not shared ownership. Not “we all own it.”

Because if everyone owns it, no one owns it.

For each responsibility, define:

  • Owner (accountable)

  • Contributors (support)

  • Informed (looped in)

That clarity immediately reduces a significant amount of leadership friction while keeping the team collaborative and execution-focused.

Step 4 – Surface the Hard Stuff

This is where most teams try to skip ahead.

Don’t.

A team charter won’t fix misalignment if leaders aren’t willing to name the real tension, but when there’s shared commitment, it accelerates clarity faster than almost any other tool I’ve seen.

Ask directly:

  • Where do we step on each other’s toes?

  • Where do decisions stall?

  • Where have we had repeated conflict?

  • What expectations have been implicit?

This conversation might feel uncomfortable.

Good.

That discomfort is the real work.

As a mediator, I can tell you that unspoken expectations cause more damage than bad strategy ever will.

Then explore the inverse by asking:

  • What does it look like to have healthy conflict?

  • How do we each prefer to give and receive feedback?

  • What process would help us stay high-functioning even when there’s disagreement?

Get granular, get specific, and get real. 

Answering these questions will help you identify the way the team wants to discuss difficult subjects while moving forward productively. 

Step 5 – Capture It in a Simple Charter

Keep it short enough that someone will actually read it.

3-5 pages max.

Team Charter Structure I Recommend

Purpose – Why we exist

Priorities – Top outcomes we own

Roles & Responsibilities – Responsibility → Named owner

Decision Rules – Who decides what

Ways of Working – How we communicate, disagree, give feedback, and escalate

Team Agreements – Behavior norms (e.g., address conflict directly)

No jargon. No corporate language. Try to keep it to plain English only.

Step 6 – Revisit It

Roles drift. That’s okay.

Especially in startups.

Put it on the calendar: Quarterly review → 30 minutes

Ask:

  • What changed?

  • What feels unclear now?

  • What needs to shift?

Small adjustments prevent big blowups.

I call these Quarterly Realignment Conversations – short, intentional check-ins designed to keep roles clear as the business evolves. 

What Actually Changes When You Do This Well?

In short, a team charter turns implicit expectations into explicit agreements.

Here’s what my clients consistently report after realigning roles with a team charter:

  • Faster decisions

  • Fewer escalations

  • Less founder or team tension

  • Clearer accountability

  • More trust

  • Better execution

But the biggest shift?

People stop protecting territory.

They start collaborating.

Because clarity reduces defensiveness.

And when defensiveness drops, performance goes up.

Final Thought

If your leadership team feels:

  • busy but stuck

  • collaborative but tense

  • capable but slow

Don’t add another tool. 

Don’t hire another manager. 

Start with alignment.

A 2-hour team charter session can prevent months of friction.

And often, that’s the difference between a team that survives growth… and one that scales together.

Many teams find that having a neutral facilitator present during this process helps surface what’s hard to say and keeps the conversation productive, especially when tensions already exist.

FAQ – Frequently Asked Questions

What is a team charter?

A team charter is a written agreement that defines a team’s purpose, roles, responsibilities, decision-making authority, and ways of working together.

How does a team charter improve role clarity?

A team charter assigns clear ownership to each responsibility so every task has one accountable person, reducing confusion, duplication, and conflict.

What’s the difference between a team charter and a job description?

A job description defines an individual's role. A team charter defines how a group works together, makes decisions, and shares accountability across roles.

Who should create a team charter?

Executive teams, startup founders, leadership groups, and cross-functional teams benefit most. The team itself—not HR—should create it together.

How long should a team charter be?

Ideally, 3–5 pages max. It should be simple, practical, and easy to reference.

How often should teams update their charter?

Quarterly. Roles and priorities shift frequently, especially in growing startups.

When should a team use a team charter?

Use one during rapid growth, leadership transitions, recurring conflict, unclear accountability, or slow decision-making.

Posted 
February 10, 2026

Read More

View All

Have a disagreement?

Sign up for our 5-day FREE email course

Help yourself get unstuck & achieve better deals

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.